Triangulating Perspectives

Author(s)
Susanne Vogl, Eva-Maria Schmidt, Ulrike Zartler
Abstract

Multiple perspective interviews (MPIs) involve interviewing members of a social group separately and triangulating their accounts during analysis to gain insights into the functioning of such groups (e.g. families). So far, there has been little engagement with the specific challenges of MPI research during the analysis, particularly with dissonant data. To illustrate the importance of this aspect, we draw on the triangulation metaphor and related epistemological and ontological perspectives, which determine analytic choices and thus yield different forms of knowledge. We show how triangulating perspectives can extend individual-level results, but also how researchers should go beyond a descriptive level of analysis for convergent and dissonant accounts to realize the potential of MPIs. Convergence should not be assumed too hastily, yet, there might be dissonance that cannot be resolved. (Self-)reflection on epistemological views, interpretive practice, and the purpose of MPI as well as their interrelation can increase the strengths of MPI approaches

Organisation(s)
Department of Education, Department of Sociology, Project: Family Studies in Austria
Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volume
22
Pages
611-624
No. of pages
14
ISSN
1364-5579
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1630901
Publication date
06-2019
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
504011 Genealogy, 504007 Empirical social research
Keywords
Portal url
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/triangulating-perspectives(22b7bd5b-3bbf-412a-a824-dfd3f22d2d77).html